Total Page Views for "Talking Transportation"

December 22, 2013

Symbiosis or Stockholm Syndrome



Connecticut has a very strange relationship with Metro-North.  Some see it as one of mutual interest.  Others describe it as an example of the Stockholm Syndrome, where a kidnap victim fights to defend its captor.
After the bankruptcies of the Penn-Central Railroad and Conrail, Connecticut’s Dept of Transportation was anxious to find anyone to run commuter rail service to NYC.  The operating agreement creating Metro-North combined Connecticut-owned tracks and rail-cars with NY State operated lines in a bi-state shotgun wedding.
Connecticut subsidizes 66% of the railroad’s operating deficit in our state and Metro-North subsidizes 34%.  But Connecticut also subsidizes 34% of the operating shortfall for riders in NY while Metro-North picks up 66% of that cost.  That’s symbiosis.
Today, 30 years later, the state of Connecticut is Metro-North’s biggest customer, representing more revenue and passengers than New York’s Hudson or Harlem lines.  But make no mistake:  Metro-North is just a vendor to the state.

The contract with Metro-North has self-renewed for the past 30 years, and CDOT has never considered alternatives.  The last time the contract went to arbitration, Connecticut was so out-gunned by NY lawyers it came out of the deal with less money, not more.  We got smacked down and have never had the guts to stand back up.
The operating agreement, now as thick as a Manhattan phone book (remember those?), is seriously lacking:
  • It gives Connecticut no seat on the Metro-North or MTA board of directors.
  • It includes no performance standards or penalties for non-compliance.
  • It is so cumbersome and arcane that it’s virtually impossible to get out of.
  • All of which leaves Connecticut with zero leverage.
As one lawmaker described it, Metro-North is like the old Lilly Tomlin character, Ernestine, the phone operator.  When customers would complain, she would say…’ too bad, we don’t care… we don’t have to, we’re the phone company!” 
Clearly, that’s how Metro-North has treated its customers, including CDOT, over the years.  They just don’t care, because they don’t have to.
And they also don’t care about how badly they have mis-managed our railroad:
  • A recent report showed that eight Metro-North foremen falsified time sheets from April thru August this year, claiming to be repairing bridges when they were actually goofing off driving to Pennsylvania to buy fireworks and cheap cigarettes.
  • Metro-North dissolved its undercover inspection team in 2012 after an audit found similar malfeasance.  Neither the unions nor management could stop the fraud.
  • In a four year period, Metro-North suspended 129 and fired 4 employees for serious safety violations.  During the same period, the Long Island Railroad (sister railroad to Metro-North) suspended 884 and fired 12 for similar infractions.
As the NY Post reported recently:  “The approach to discipline at Metro-North revolves around a lengthy adjudication process — first, there’s a hearing; then a review of the hearing transcript; a ruling from a hearing officer follows; then the accused can appeal to the railroad’s vice president of labor relations. If that doesn’t work, an appeal can be filed with the state Labor Department.”

When you start paying higher fares in January, ask yourself:  How can this go on?  Who is running this railroad?  And why is CDOT not outraged enough to even consider alternative operators?

2 comments:

Jim Sullivan said...

Wow. So its…
-CT generates more revenue than NY for MNR.
-CT has no representation.
-CT-based, six figure-earning MNR employees have reduced accountability/oversight compared to NY-based counterparts.
Not sure I completely understood, but it seems to indicate CT passengers subsidize NY passengers. If that’s the case, my recent fare hike makes more sense.
I must say, I really didn’t know what I was getting into when I decided to become a MNR captive.

Patrick @ The LIRR Today said...

Connecticut would be incapable of supporting service on its own. Additionally, it is highly doubtful that MNCR would ever allow a private operator to run on its tracks in New York State and its Grand Central Terminal.

New York State manages to contract out services on the Port Jervis and Pascack Valley Lines to NJTransit without having to cry foul every time something goes wrong. Did you hear Governor Cuomo crying for NYS control after Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy? Nope.

This doesn't have a leg to stand on.